![]() seem to work best with one or 2 downward pulling magnets and 3 machine nuts on the rotor to pick up extra energy, Naturally bigger rotors will require more balance and likely more magnets but remember lightness and balance and the angle of the draw magnet are critical regardless of what size rotor or wheel you use. ![]() My rotor of 3.5 in or the diameter of a common c.d. My experiments seem the indicate that the Magnet Motor seems to work best as an energy harvester where you can position coils both hollow and bifilar to grab electric energy from the magnets as they spin by. Your field magnets must be angled carefully and 45% is a good place to start, as if they do like the YouTube guys and place the field magnet directly across from the rotor magnet it will fail as the heavy drag of ‘back pull’ will kill the rotation, As for me 3 magnets with one on the bottom to give a constant down pull works best tho by keeping rotor weight light and use a down pull I admit I’m cheating a bit as I am also using gravety down pull to help overcome the weight of the magnets on the upward pull etc.įorget the YouTube ideals of hooking a drive belt to the rotor as that will never work? Balance and the bearing in the rotors is also a critical factor function.ĥ. Really good and realistic topics are being discussed here sic!.Īs my own experiments tend towards your earlier conclusions but i must stress the following.ġ.Keep rotor weight light and that is a must.Ģ.Use only the exact amount of magnets you need as w too many magnets the rotor wont run right.ģ.Friction is the main killer of magnet motors as too much weight means the magnet impulse will not spin the rotor and the back drag and emf wave will kill both the current and rotation sic.Ĥ. Still, maybe someday someone will be able to produce free energy by using magnet motors. Perendev was charged of scamming some people and even served for a while. It seems to me that this is basically the Perendev motor presented in the same-named category of our blog. If you find any reason of not running this mechanism let me know.” On the left primary measurements of needed objects are given. But think of friction between rotating disk and Shaft, it can be neglected by using magnetic joint between them. Here friction and other losses are neglected as magnets are much more powerful. If all the objects are made precisely with measurements given and the rectangular cubic magnets are powerful enough to rotate more then 30 degrees in first repulsion then the system will work. When designing you may think of losses or may think that when rotating disk rotates 30 degrees and magnet M0 will be rotating clock-wise on the plate over G2 then it may start to repel M1 after it has rotated about 25 degrees, the solution is to use more powerful magnets. The space between two disk is just more than the width of magnets M0 and M1 and space needed for connecting gear G0 to rotating disk with a rod. So if the first repulsion of Magnets M1 and M0 is powerful enough to make rotating-disk rotate 30-degrees or more the disk would rotate till error occurs in position of disk, friction loss or magnetic energy loss. Now the angle and teeth ratio of G0 and G1 is such that when the magnet M1 moves 30 degree, the other magnet which came in the position where M1 was, it will be repelled by the magnet of Fixed-disk as the magnet on Fixed-disk has moved 360 degrees on the plate above gear G1. So the magnet over G1 rotate in the direction perpendicular to that of fixed-disk surface. So after repulsion if Rotating-Disk rotates it will rotate the gear G0 which is connected to gear G1. Now the large gear G0 is connected directly to Rotating disk with a rod. Now there is another magnet at 30 angular distance on Rotating Disk on both side of the magnet M1. Now the magnet over the left disk will try to rotate the disk below in (think) clock-wise direction. ![]() If the magnet over gear G1’s north side is parallel to that of which is over Rotating disk then they both will repel each other. ![]() One fixed plate over rotating disk with North side parallel to disk surface, and other on the rotating plate connected to small gear G1. Here is the whole process of transforming the free magnetic energy into mechanical energy, explained by the invention’s author (Sandeep Acharya): Also read: This Device Extends Your Phone's Battery Lifespan Like Nothing Else.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |